tonight, tonight

Yes, kids, this evening is the long-awaited drinks with Sarah Brown, who claims it should take less than 15 minutes to disabuse me of my belief that she’s pretty, witty, and gay [ed. note: in the “fun and happy” sense of the word]. Sorry, Ms. Brown, but no matter how horribly tonight turns out, you’ll always have a piece of my heart for things like yesterday’s text message: “Sunday Sunday Sunday? You’ll pay for the whole seat but you’ll only need THE EDGE.”

And anyway, how could an evening be less than stellar once you’ve invoked the watchful spirit of Truckasaurus Rex?

|  

newman’s first law of booty magnetism

Apropos my last post, I’ve recently been honing a gender-differentiated theory on attractiveness and attraction. Though it’s still rough, I think I’m ready to share the basics:

Guys: At first glance, we boys talk a big game, rating women ruthlessly (“look at her calves; I can’t give her better than a seven”). But when it comes down to it, we don’t really value looks as much as our guy-banter implies. We do, however, have a minimum attractiveness threshold, a point below which, no matter how much we like the girl, we just couldn’t bring ourselves to see her naked. Though it’s strictly inviolable (consider the number of guys who, though feeling remarkably guilty about it, have a close female friend they’d marry if only she were slightly more attractive), it’s also probably much lower than girls would likely assume (rarely higer than a six, even for the most critical men). So long as she’s above the minimum cutoff, a cool girl the guy loves to spend time with trumps a hotter-but-boring one every time. In other words, while we guys have an inviolable minimum, above that line we weight personality more heavily than looks.

Girls: Ladies, however, have no fixed minimum. As Voltaire observed, give a charming guy ten minutes to talk away his ugly face and he could bed the Queen of France. (Hence the vast majority of women who have dated [or fallen in love with] men they initially found horribly unattractive – something we guys find inconceivable.) Conversely, however, women factor in attractiveness the whole way up; there is no point after which additional beauty doesn’t much matter. Which is to say, with most women, a totally rockin’ 7 would face stiff competition from a merely reasonably interesting 10.

The groups of friends on which I’ve tested the theory have nearly universally agreed, but I’d love to hear from readers who can help hone the details (or perhaps rebut my hopethesis altogether). If you’ve gleaned some sharable yet hard-earned insight from the battlefields of love,

all grows up

You know when you’re on a plane, and you’re one of the early boarders, and the seat next to you is empty, and every time a really, really hot girl walks on you think “please, please, please let her seat be next to mine”? Well, this time, hers was. Though, sadly, she had the brains of toothpaste. Which, frankly, in my younger days, would not have even been cause for momentary pause (as several regrettable past exploits amply demonstrated). This time, however, when at the end of the flight, she asked if I’d maybe want to meet up for drinks at some point in San Francisco, I instead demurred, saying that I’d just be in for a night or two, and would be terribly busy the whole time.

Passing up easy hot-stupid-girl booty. The first sign of adulthood?

a second date

Despite the slew of Friendster filly rendezvous, I realize it’s been a while since I’ve been genuinely excited for a date.

|  

double header

Yesterday evening, I staggered drunkenly through two dates, the first a not-really-a-date-but-a-girl-I-knew-and-lost-touch-with-and-met-again-randomly-and-invited-out-for-drinks date, the second a part of the aforementioned (though now mainly repurposed for print) Friendster booty experiment. In short, the results:

The Friendster date was so bad as to be excruciatingly painful; I have now consequently imposed a minimum IQ requirement (and a maximum Gucci limit) on all future booty. [Further details, sadly, must be saved for the actual article.]

The first date (or non-date), however, was absolutely excellent, leaving me wishing it was more of a date date. Though, actually, it may have been more of a date date than I initially realized; at least, that’s what I started to suspect over the course of the evening. Which may have been largely due to the increasing influence of each passing drink. Either way, I was too much of a pansy to push my luck and test that theory. But I’m hoping to drag her out again, at which point, nerves steeled, my luck will definitely be pushed. [Note to the girl, who is doubtless reading this very entry: you have been forewarned.] [Meta-note regarding the previous note: yes, I am aware that using a weblog in this manner is largely akin to the middle school classic “my friend thinks your friend is cute,” about which I am wholly unrepentant. I say: whatever works.]

|  

hey casanova, redux

To extend today’s theme of sappy girl-gift giving tips, another helpful hint for intrepid young daters:

Wrap the gift very well. I repeat, wrap the gift very well. If you cannot, find a store that can (and have them teach you, so you can do it on your own in the future).

Invariably, she would rather receive an empty box exquisitely wrapped than whatever you’ve bought for her in a brown paper bag. (This makes no sense to me either; but it is the way of the world.)

Nota Bene. My online friend Nara Vaughan adds:

Dead right on the gift-wrapping, though it is important to wrap it YOURSELF, not just have the girl at the store do it. (Too professional indicates lack of personal effort.) Tip: Plus points for a small flower/flowers tucked into the ribbon on the top of the present.

|  

hey casanova

On the way to my office this morning, I passed a man buying two dozen roses for his girlfriend’s birthday. I wanted to stop him, to tell him she’d be just as happy to receive a single hand-picked rose as that giant tangled bunch. And what she’d really want, I would have told him, is to receive the other 23 roses, one by one, on days that weren’t birthdays or anniversaries or Hallmark holidays, but where he was just passing by a flower shop and thinking of her.

We guys don’t get it. In our minds, a bigger, more expensive toy is always a better gift than a smaller one. But in the perilous world of girl-gift giving, it really is the thought that counts. Any present that requires effort on our part, demonstrates we were listening that time she hinted at liking something two months back, or just implies that we spend large chunks of the time we’re alone thinking about her, is solid gold.

any advice?

Is there a statute of limitations on dating friends’ exes? After how many years of post-breakup time does that become kosher? Or is it always tref?

|  

it’s worse than you thought

It seems I may have to preemptively curtail my Friendster booty-blogging, as a very major publication (one that really should know better) has asked that I turn such pending exploits into a print feature. If I play my cards right, I just might be able to permanently destroy the entirety of my future love life,

|  

interlude – q and a

Q. Haven’t you blogged about your love life in the past? Didn’t you stop because it made a horrible mess?
A. Yes. But I’m a glutton for punishment.

Q. What will your mother say when she discovers you’re back to your old hijinks?
A. She will not be pleased. She will not be pleased at all.

Q. Wait. Just a few days ago, you were writing about having a crush on Sarah Brown. Now you’re off chasing other women. What gives?
A. While the crush is still officially on, Que Sera Sera World Headquarters is located in Tulsa, Oklahoma, some fifteen hundred miles away. To paraphrase Ritchie Tenenbaum, “I guess I’ll just have to be secretly in love with her and leave it at that.”

Q. Also, weren’t you pulling together a blog-based dating site? Does this Friendster mission mark the end of that project?
A. No, the blog-based dating site is still very much alive and well. I’ve been making some good progress, though as I have a number of other, more pressing, projects going simultaneously, it may be a couple of months before blogbooty.com (or whatever it will be called; actually, I just made that name up and I kind of like it) hits the web.

Q. You say you’re doing this to prove that straight guys can keep interesting blogs, but ________ is straight and his blog is great.
A. Possible answers include:

  1. ________ has simply yet to come to grips with his latent homosexuality.
  2. You’re a moron; ________’s site sucks.
  3. Good point.

Q. Wait, isn’t self-aggrandizement itself a straight guy’s blog that has existed for years and now draws a fair number of regular readers?
A. Well, actually, yes. On average, about five thousand different people (counted by unique IPs) visit the site each week. Still, over the past year, the amount of drunken mischief chronicled herein has fallen off dramatically, largely due to 1.) being wildly busy with getting Cyan off the ground, and 2.) following that, being in a relationship too good to screw up with stupid blog melodrama. Now that I’m back to bachelorhood, however, I’m hoping these escapades will serve as the kick in the ass I need to lift the site (and my love life) back to its former exploitative glory.

|